geekent’s stuff’n things

09/05/2008

Comics and me: a history (part 3)

Filed under: ...and me: a history, Comics — geekent @ 6:16 pm

(part 1)
(Part 2)

By the end of my last year of high school I was still very much a comics junkie. Although I have never tried to completely kick the habit, I did spend a lot of time then paring back my pull list and attempted to manage how much I actually acquired on a month-to-month basis. I had a disposable income and boy howdy I used it.

sman-tshirt.jpg
University beaconed and it seemed suddenly the self-conscious, nebbish outsider with big glasses and oversized t-shirts that had entered high school was finding unlikely acceptance in his new environment. All it took was a little refinement in personal grooming and attire to lead to greater self-confidence, and reestablishment (or redefining) of identity…. it all did wonders for my social life and thus self-esteem. Yeah, I was still a geek, but post-secondary, being a geek suddenly wasn’t all that bad. My Superman “S”-shield t-shirt was a big hit on campus and I found new social circles to play in that embraced individuality rather than conformity. Nobody ever looked differently upon me for my comic book fanaticism, and a few people even found me more the interesting for it. People who were snobbish in high school now seemed relaxed and cool, just as some less socially adept kids seemed equally relieved to have left an old life behind. People in upper years of university didn’t look down on the new kids, not the same way a grade 12 grad would look at a grade 9 freshman (if at all). It was like an even playing field, and you could connect with anyone, and everyone seemed to be walking with their minds open, receptive to what’s different and new. A comic book habit was not uncommon.

My tastes had redeveloped between my closing year of high school and the opening year of University, and I was no longer looking at comics and movies and music as strictly entertainment but also as art. The conceptual side of things began to play as much a part in my enjoyment of entertainment as the execution, and I learned to see past merely my gut reaction and analyze what I had taken in a little more. Movies, while being for the masses, have always catered strongly to an adult audience, but even though I had always trumpeted the maturity level comics could achieve I rarely looked past the development of the superhero genre, and often hit a wall trying transcending them. But, within my new environment I was encouraged to explore things beyond what I knew, to look outside the box in terms of how I thought, and I extended this to my comics interest.

invisibles9.jpgVertigo was the most readily available source, and I became a fast proponent of the imprint, the bulk of the stories weaved around some element of fantasy or another, but frequently literary in bent or cerebral in storytelling. Neil Gaiman, Steve Seagle, Warren Ellis, Garth Ennis, Grant Morrison and more became the new face of comics, the people daring to do something different and succeeding at it. Series like Sandman Mystery Theatre, Preacher, and the Invisibles weren’t the first things I would read when I picked up my weekly stash of books, and often were left lying aside for weeks or months — my affinity for superheroes still reigned supreme — but it was those Vertigo books that messed my shit up, that really got me excited about what the medium could do and how stories could be told. That DC and Marvel both embraced these writers on their mainstream superheroes tells me that their editorial wanted the same thing out of their superhero books, to recapture the sense of excitement Superman or the Fantastic Four gave them when they were kids, reviving them with a new sense of adult-centric thrills. Either that or they were desperate for someone to pull them out of the atrocious rut they found themselves in after the comics bust of the mid-90’s.

Thanks to Vertigo, I became more adventurous in the titles I was selecting, venturing outside the mainstream, looking at Slave Labor, Oni Press, Caliber and a host of other publishers who came (most who also, shortly thereafter, went) to try something new. What I learned was superheroes are predictable, and dependable… even with bad superhero books you know what you’re going to get. But with indie and smaller press books, it’s a real crapshoot, and there’s little or no sense of familiarity with most of them. Sometimes the artistic style is underdeveloped, over-simplistic, or downright horrible, other times the writing isn’t nearly as insightful as the ideas, or the ideas aren’t befitting the writing. I picked up quite a few anthologies in the later 1990’s as a means of trying creators out, as I discovered that I could more rely upon a writer or an artist to deliver than I could a series, or character, or company.

(more…)

10/04/2008

Reviewing and me: a history (part 2)

Filed under: ...and me: a history — geekent @ 8:45 pm

(Part 1)

I’ve verging on burning out on reviewing these days, with too much to do, too little help and not enough energy to really sustain a satisfying level of creativity, thoroughness or even intellect. My reviews as of late feel more like going through the motions, even more so like work… highly time consuming, unpaid work.

In mentioning to my good friend GAK of my critical fatigue, he had a few points to note:

I share the thoughts that you and other long-time reviewers have on exhaustion on the volume of backlog or the quality of content. My main issue was that reviewing removed a serious chunk of my ability to appreciate or even like at a reptilian-brainstem level whatever was being reviewed. Like quantifying the impact [thus] minimizing it. The corollary to that is reviewing at its essential core is about saying “hey, this is good, I want others to like it” or “that, there’s potential there, keep an eye on the creator” because sharing what is out there is good for everyone’s soul. But it’s precarious because the burden of expectation can destroy the fragile act of appreciation. I can tell it’s been getting a labour to review certain things on your part, which is ironically timed as your years of exposure is starting to reap massive benefits.

All he says is so incredibly true to my situation, every point of it. There’s not much need to extrapolate upon it because it’s such a economical summary of where my brain is at these days regarding what I do so very often in my spare time. But how did I get here? How did I get to now, where I’m at a level where I think I’m fairly good at what I do and yet so frustrated with the process? There are many people who are getting paid for doing this kind of thing, and I’m not one of them. The problem is, I’m better than a lot of them at it (bad reviewer with prominent exposure makes me very angry), but does that mean I’d feel more comfortable with it all were it a job? I’m not so sure, and mainly because I’m no Roger Ebert. I know that nobody is Ebert except Ebert but if he’s the benchmark then it’s like I’m reaching for God and until I feel that I’m at least one-eight as focussed as Ebert, one-eigth as perceptive, intuitive or witty (all things very hard to learn too) I’m not really ready for the money earning side of it. Money means you’re a professional, and therefore accountable, so it’s really a face climb upwards.

(more…)

09/02/2008

Reviewing and me: a history (part 1)

Filed under: ...and me: a history, Reviews — geekent @ 2:05 pm

Reviewing stuff, as you may or may not have noticed, is a big part of my life… a big, fat, exhausting aspect of my daily existence. I was thinking the other day about how much work being a reviewer is, how much pressure there is to write honest commentary, as well as how much responsibility there is when your words are representing someone else’s creative work. As I was going to bed the other night, a little frustrated after a small dose of writer’s block, I wished I could just write reviews like, well, how the worst of them do: chumming completely up to the source (making for great -if ambiguous and meaningless- pull quotes like “you won’t believe your eyes” or “what a thrill ride”) or providing unsubstantiated opinions like “it’s crap” or “this is awesome”.

I was recently provided a copy of the first issue of a comic book, Cemetery Blues, by its artist, Thomas Boatwright, given the simple request of “When you have the time, please give it a read, and if you feel so inclined post a review.” There’s a part of me that feels, regardless of quality, that I have to praise a book when it’s provided to me by a writer or an artist (or a publisher), like I have a responsibility to bolster the work just because they’ve taken the time and effort to give it to me. Though I do get over that initial impulse, when you’re asked by creators to review their work the responsibility is even greater to ensure that the review is as honest as possible, and moreover constructive. I quite liked Cemetery Blues (and said so in my review) but it’s not without its failings (and said so in my review). In writing a review, I could easily have said only good things, but I think it’s just as important to the audience as to the creators that I tell them what I didn’t like (and more importantly why). As a reviewer, I’m serving an audience of many, not of one, and not of myself.

Thomas responded to my review stating: “I love creative criticism that stems from actually having read the book. Too many sound bites in this day and age based on knee jerk reactions.” Me too. I call that kind of reviewing the “Larry King effect” and it’s one of the most irksome aspects of the internet and the rise of blogging. Everyone’s got opinions, and now everyone has a forum to speak their mind. But it’s how people speak their minds, and their approach to reviewing that makes reading it worthwhile. It’s taken me a long time to be a conscientious reviewer and to be comfortable with the work that I’m putting out to the public, but where did it all start for me…and why?

(more…)

04/02/2008

Comics and me: a history (part 2)

Filed under: ...and me: a history, Comics — geekent @ 8:25 am

(part 1)


wizard1issue.jpg It was the tail-end of summer, school soon about to start. I don’t remember how I found out, but I wound up at the May Street Used Book Store, 15 years old, picking up two copies of each of the five covers of X-Men #1. I don’t know why it became so important for me to have so many copies of that comic, but that’s pretty much where my “collector’s head” mentality started, definitely the start. Maybe it was point of pride amongst geeks to say to one another “I have x-number of copies of X-Men #1, how many do you have? I don’t really recall. Up until then, I was pretty happy to just pick my weekly Superman-related titles and Justice League books up off the spinner rack, but now, here I was, suddenly and completely entrenched in collector fervor. Atop my pile of comics that day (all the same damn book with, cover aside, no unique content) was the first issue of Wizard: The Guide To Comics.


Wizard, an upstart magazine, competing with Comic Report, Comic Buyers Guide, and a few others, was all about promoting what’s “hot” and telling you why. The magazine’s focus was not telling readers about good comics, but collectible ones. The back material of the magazine featured a price guide, and for the first time I became aware of the “value” of comics. It wasn’t just about having something (like 20 issues of X-Men #1), but about investing. An impressionable mind like myself was enraptured by the thought of my hobby becoming something for financial gain, and with my new friend Wizard by my side, I would be directed towards everything that would give me a nest egg for my future… or so I believed. Suddenly, plastic bags and backing boards were needed for everything comic. Grading comics based on their condition was also essential, and anything that didn’t cut the “very fine” mustard would go in the discards box. My collection, which was sitting in a heavy-duty wooden box my dad made out of scraps, was 150 books full and my engagement was just ramping up.

(more…)

03/01/2008

Comics and me: a history (part 1)

Filed under: ...and me: a history, Comics — geekent @ 2:42 pm

I wrote a report in high school for peer editing which I called “My first comic book” (or somesuch)… I believe the intent of the assignment as we were given was to detail our earliest memory. If my first memory were really of a comic book then my lifelong obsession would be easily understood, but, no that was kind of a cheat. Even the essay itself was a bit of a lie, since I detailed the story of “my first comic book” as the cherished memory of acquiring my tabloid-sized Superman vs. Muhammad Ali. I’m almost certain that it wasn’t my first comic book, and amidst all my tens of thousands of comic books, it’s probably not my first comic book memory, but it is one I do remember quite vividly.

supermanvmuhammadali.jpg


I remember the dingy store in Victoriaville in Thunder Bay which had a counter with cigarettes and smoking-related things everywhere, candy and chocolate bars and lots of lottery paraphernalia. At the end of the counter ran a long and tall, multi-tiered wooden magazine rack where many of the comics were stored. Beyond that, precariously stocked shelves of toys, mostly the cheap Japanese import stuff, but sometimes things I actually wanted. There was a stand-up wire magazine rack which had a few of these oversized comics as well as things like Life magazine, probably Rolling Stone and other such tabloid-format thing. The publishing date of “Superman vs. Muhammad Ali” is somewhere around 1978, so obviously I didn’t get this when it was released, as I was two at the time and most likely wasn’t aware who Superman was yet. I’m betting it was around 1980 or 81, putting me around 5 years old, and that seems about right. I can’t imagine this comic sitting on the shelf for four years, but if it sat there for two, then why not four?

(more…)

Powered by WordPress