geekent’s stuff’n things

28/01/2005

ReceSS and more

Filed under: this blog — graigkent @ 10:22 pm

RSS Feeds

geek.ent. is RSS friendly… almost
to get the main Notes From Epstein’s Mother on RSS you need to use:
www.geekent.com/blog/index.rdf
to get Entertainment Etcetera’s reviews, use:
www.geekent.com/whatsentertainingthegeek/index.rdf
and to get the erratic 21 Minutes mp3 blog via RSS use:
www.geekent.com/21/index.rdf

Pissa

The Beast, a strange magazine from Buffalo has drafted their 50 Most Loathsome People of 2004. Yeah, all the expected celebrities, pundants and political peoples are on the list and a few surprises. It’s hilarious, though, doling out punishment to each of the guilty.
My favourite:

13. Joan Rivers
Crimes: The most ghastly face science has managed to create without the use of chemical weapons. As a pioneer in facial reconstruction, she shows us that, in the future, every famous woman will gradually turn into a cross between a sickly geisha and the Joker. The red carpet fashion-cop shtick she does with her broken, spiritless daughter is such an obvious inferiority complex manifestation we almost feel sorry for them, until we remember they’re making millions of dollars for it.
Smoking Gun: The sheer, ugly self-hatred of a woman with that face, that voice, and that personality nitpicking Nicole Kidman.
Punishment: Face falls off into wet cement at Mann’s Chinese Theatre.

Snowpants

My Moms bought me a pair of shell pants, you know the expensive, rugged, outdoor type that makes that “fweep fweep fweep” sound as you walk. I normally wear them in the spring/fall as I bike in the rain/wet road conditions, but it’s cold enough out these days that I need the extra exterior protection. The problem is they aren’t very fashionable. I feel like I’m twelve again.. I rode my toboggan to work! Wanna go crazy carpeting later?
But I’m thankful when I wear them, especially when I wait outside in neg30deg weather for 20 minutes for the streetcar to come and then the streetcar subsequently breaks down and I need to wait another 20 for another one to come. Yes, very thankful.

iTuned Out?

One of my resolutions this year was to purchase the bulk of my music on line via iTunes or other similar mp3 download places like Bleep, iTunes, or Zunior… and yet I just found out that iTunes sampling rate is 128kps… which is satisfactory (like, the bare minimum ripping compression rate), but when a cd’s compression rate is actually over 1300kps, there’s a pretty big gap between. Zunior uses 192kps and Bleep uses 205kps (both with using LAME compression technology).
I think I need to rethink this. I dunno… does it really make a difference? I mean, I’m not a sound snob. I can’t really tell the difference between a 192kps mp3 and a wav file. Then again, I can really tell there’s a difference in some songs on my iPod, but I think that’s more the mastering of the cd (which can be produced at different volumes… or even take an old cd from the early 90’s compared to one of todays cd’s and it’s like the old cd is on “hush” mode).
I think I’ll try a few downloads from a few different places (when the money provides), but I think I’m going to keep with the cds for now (that way I can sample and resample at a compression rate I’m happy with until the on-line retail catches up).
It’s an insane amount of listening, even if you are being selective.

#^(!@*%

For the second year in a row I got a quotable quote in the Exclaim reader’s poll. It’s almost regrettable that it’s for the Arcade Fire. But I have to admit it’s a nice quote… and hell, yes, I still mean it.
The AF backlash is happening, overexposure at its worst. And it’s not the band’s fault, but the fans. Just think, if blogging was around in ‘98 we’d all be sick to shit of Neutral Milk Hotel and “In The Aeroplane Over The Sea” too.
Meanwhile I keep recording on-line exclusive music…
this week’s CBC Radio3 zine showcases 101 (yes, one hundred and one) Concerts and Sessions recorded exclusively for CBC (and then rerecorded exclusively for me by way of my computer). Bands range from Death Cab For Cutie to Ted Leo, Buck 65 to Young and Sexy. It’s overwhelming, really.

February Doldrums Got You Down? DVD BABY!

What’s out (abridged from the special ed):
Feb 1
- The Brak Show vol 1 (It is I, cloneborg)
- Sealab 2021 vol 2 (BIZARRO!)
- Wonderfalls: The Complete Series
Feb 8
- The Fresh Prince of Bel Air: The Complete First Season (You know all the words to the theme song… you know you do, don’t try and deny it! I love this show.)
- The Greatest American Hero: Season One (Believe it or not..)
- Malcolm X: Special Edition
- Miami Vice: Season One (Michael Mann where he began, with Crockett and Tubbs… white suits, no socks, guns and lots of neon)
- Rocky III (the forecast… is paaaain. And some other Rocky stuff out the same day)
Feb 15
- Angel: Season Five (no more Buffy stuff on DVD ever! I made the geeks cry.)
- Donnie Darko: Director’s Cut (YESYESYESYES, they made me do it)
- Half Baked: Fully Baked Edition (Classic Dave Chappelle, see what Jon Stewart’s been talking about for the past four years)
- The Ice Pirates (oh, no way, I’ve not seen this since the mid-80’s)
Feb 22
- Cube Zero (wow, I didn’t even know there was another Cube movie, this one a prequel. I love these films!)
- Heat: Special Edition (if you don’t already own the old edition, you MUST own this one. One of the greatest movies ever)
and jumping ahead
April 05 - Primer. If there’s ever a movie screaming for repeated viewings and a commentary track…

Wash That Grey Right Outta Your Hair

Yeah, the grey hairs are becoming more numerous, but I don’t care.
I don’t.
I’m actually looking forward to my Reed Richards temples and eventual salt’n'pepper mixture.
I’ve just learned how to properly care for my hair, making it more managable than ever before. The trick is to get out of the daily wash-rinse-repeat cycle and instead opt for a shampooing once every 5 to 7 days.
Instead, using small amount of good conditioner on a daily basis and keeping my hair under a toque until I get to work. No “product” needed. Even when it’s at this annoying lenth it is now, I don’t have any trouble with it.
I just blogged about my hair…
oi.

27/01/2005

A Very Long Engagement

Filed under: In Theatre — gkentetc @ 11:42 pm

very-long-engagement-5.jpg

d: Jean-Pierre Jeunet,
w: Guillaume Laurant, Jean-Pierre Jeunet

JP Jeunet reunites with his Amelie actress, the classic beauty Audrey Tautou with this film, but anyone who thinks they know what to expect from Jeunet has no idea.
His limited but great film career all have a consistent quirkiness to them, as well as a strong visual esthetic, and, with the exception of his singular stint in Hollywood (Alien: Resurrection) his films all have a specific resonance… innocence, daydreamy hope, and a wry sense of humour.
A Very Long Engagement is all these things, but it’s an entity amongst itself not only in Jeunet’s career but in cinema all around. At the same time it’s a gruelling World War I movie with graphic elements on par with Saving Private Ryan. On the other hand you have a love story, with all it’s strange asides akin to Amelie. And then there’s the detetective mystery which rings more of Murder She Wrote than Hitchcock. And there’s even a noirish revenge story strewn throughout.

(more…)

25/01/2005

Crippling Debt Problems

Filed under: me me me — graigkent @ 1:02 pm

Johnny’s dead.
Paige is leving Trading Spaces.
Mudslides in California and North Vancouver.
George Bush calling from inside the White House to speak to a pro-life rally OUTSIDE the White House.
Damn people at Visa tacking on another $1300 to my credit limit.
Further signs of the apocalypse…

budget conscious

A lot of us are in the same boat. Things just aren’t like they were in our parent’s day. We didn’t get unionized jobs-for-life out of high school, we couldn’t even get a decent job unless we went to post-secondary school… a system which is inherently favours those already with money.
Some of us amassed our debt via a government sponsored loan, the whole system of which has been shifted and fluxuated over the years, handed over to financial institutions to manage more scrupulously. Some of us, like me, amassed our debt through generous loans via plasic cards shamelessly doled out by the very same financial institutions.
We’re living in a crippling debt problematic environment. On average, wages havn’t gone up with the cost of living, government privatization has only served to jack up the CPI. The only way some of us can survive is via credit cards and other such money making schemes.
But that’s not the only symptom of the crippling debt polemic, aggressive advertising and the focus on consumer culture in North America is actually brutalizing our way of life. We all buy into it. We’re all fanatic about buying something. For me it’s been different things over the years… action figures, dvds, comics, trading cards. For others its shoes or clothing or stamps or sports equipment. Still others are constantly buying new technology, having the next best thing. Not to mention that nothing is really built to last anymore. Cars from the 1950s lasted decades. Cars from the 1980’s on have a general 10 year lifespan. Televisions get fuzzy, speakers blow, software becomes outdated (if it ever truly works right in the first place). Telephone companies turn everything into “extras”, cable and satellite offer you many choices but never configured to optimize your dollar.
Everything in this world is out there to take your money and drive you further into debt. The banks are the biggest culprit, especially in Canada. We have about 5 major banks here: TD, RBC, BMO, Scotia, CIBC. There are other institutions but those five are the BIG five. They gross billions every year, with no exaggeration. BILLIONS. And each year, they need to get more money. All corporations are like that. It doesn’t matter how much you’re making, the next year you need to make more. Shareholders return and whatnot.
Just how much money does a company need to have, anyway.
Remember back in the mid 80’s when instant tellers were first emerging, and banks were imploring you to use them instead of the real people behind the counter. Remember they said it was cheaper for them to have instant tellers than it was to have real people. Remember how they made a big fuss, waiving various account fees when using the teller…
And what’s it like today, now that we all rely on instant tellers for the majority of our banking. Service fees and interac charges, $1, $1.25, $1.50 and climbing… sometimes 10 or 12 bucks a month for me. Times that by millions of customers. No wonder they’re doing that.

the story of my debt

the descending slope
My debt began with the best intentions. I had a credit card throughout University which I did a good job at keeping a close to 0 balance. When I decided to get engaged (the first time) I paid for the ring on Visa, which effectively maxed me out. I never had a chance to recover from that.
At the time, living in Barrie in ‘99 with my then-fiancee, I was working Management at Wal-Mart. If you’ve ever worked there, or if you know anyone that’s worked there, then you know that they pay shit, and they pay their management even less than shit ($36k/year for a 60+ hour work week). So I wasn’t making any money, and then, you know, building a life with someone, you start buying things together like furniture and televisions and computers and whatnot.
We didn’t have a good computer at the time… it had problems. So we decided that since I didn’t have student loans to pay off that I should apply for an increase on my Visa so we could buy a new computer. When I went into the TD branch to get that extension, they asked if I wouldn’t want a line of credit instead. They sold me on it with their low interest rates and the integration with my regular bank card (so I wouldn’t need another card). We were only going for a $2000 credit card, and they gave me a $5000 line of credit instead.
Now, I didn’t want a $5000 line of credit, because I knew me, and I knew my spending habits and I knew I would use it. So I had them restrict usage to the $2K I had initially wanted.
We bought our computer, and I would pay off bits on my Visa and bits off my line of credit, but invariably, with car troubles and gas and food and entertainment, I would always spend what I paid off. I was always maxed out. (Heh, “was”). It didn’t help that I was unhappy, and so I was finding other avenues to happiness, which for me had always been collecting stuff. I bought, literally, thousands of dollars worth of action figures and accessories during that year, and then DVD came out and I became obsessed with movies. Why rent when you can buy? And I bought both a Playstation and a Nintendo 64, and kept buying games I rarely played (there were a few that I was addicted to and would waste much time with them… much, much time, which is why I don’t have a gaming system now).
When I broke off the relationship (in a very bad way, mind you) I left most of the “mutual purchases” behind. All the furniture, the television, computer, my grandmother’s table (which my sister is still pissed about)… I just wanted out you know.
But I wasn’t heartless about it. We were locked in a lease which, when I spoke to the landlord, he wouldn’t let us out of, so I did the honourable thing and gave them the remaining 5 months worth of rent in post dated cheques. Of course, I didn’t know where the money would come from. I was leaving town and my job to go live back home. I had to call the bank and get them to lift the hold on the rest of the $3000.
a steeper grade
Back in Thunder Bay mid 2000, I was having a rough time coming to terms with where my life was at. So I was spending credit wherever I could… nights out at the bar, frequent restauranting, movies, photography… and every Tuesday… “new release Tuesday”, I was at the Future Shop buying at least two DVDs and some cds. Not to mention Amazon.com was just taking off and I was getting unprecedented access to things I wouldn’t be able to get at home. It was a bad scene, forgetting the fact that, having been transferred to the T.Bay Wal-Mart, I actually took a pay cut (from shit to shit eater).
But the credit gods saw my activity, paying off my minimum balance and spending it again, and so during my year back in Thunder Bay, both Visa and the Line of Credit had increased my credit amounts. Twice.
And I spent it. Oh boy did I ever.
Especially when I started dating again. I was paying for everything, not with out my lady companions offering mind you, but at the time I was too much of a gentleman big shot with my Wal-Mart smock and “GRAIG” name badge.
the thunderslide
By the summer of 2001, I was done. I love my friends there but I was going crazy. My girlfriend had moved out of town, I hated my job, and I wasn’t feeling like I was doing anything with my life. So I quit that hell hole, packed up a duffle bag, threw it in the trunk of the car, took my riding companions (Steve, Eddy, Tibor and Jimbo, they were actually action figures of Spider-Man, Nightcrawler, a Star Wars droid, and a Powerpuff Girl) on a trip around Ontario.
I had about $400 saved for the trip, and when I decided that I was going to quit, I still had about $5000 left in credit to use. I took a trip into Ottawa and looked for work there (don’t even bother if you’re not bilingual), but fortune favoured the bold and a good friend landed me a job in Toronto.
Within three days of being in Toronto I had a new job and a new apartment, and a car with a duffle bag. Having never lived on my own before, I knew I needed some essentials. I managed to snag a bed/futon from my ex and I went to Ikea for the first time an loaded up. I ploughed through two or three grand easy.
My Visa was still maxed out and my line of credit ($14k) was withering away. I started trying to cub my expenses, having a decent job and all, and I actually started to do it. I pared back my Visa by almost $2000 and my line of credit receeded around $10k. I was happy to be making progress. But then my contract ended. I was unemployed for a few months. It quickly began to eat into my reductions, even with unemployment insurance covering the major bill (rent).
Food and leisure were still taxing my credit line. And then, in 2002, Emma came along.
I don’t blame any of my relationships for my crippling debt problem (CDP). The CDP is a symptom of my own personality quirks… obsessive and completist behaviour, as well as damnable pride with a bit of chivalry. Emma took good care of me, actually, but I still tried to impress her with my frivolous spending habits, which, when I wasn’t working, was managing only to drive me to the point of complete credit exhaustion.
Thankfully (!?) Emma found me a new job. It payed about as well as Wal-Mart did, but slowly it began to be a completely uninhabitable environment to work in… toxic. I was pretty unhappy again.
Emma and I had moved in together, and once again I found myself building a home with someone, with all the financial burdens that causes. It’s not just about furniture, but it’s also food, and cleaning supplies, regular maintenance, and I still had a car that was having a severe breakdown. We soon found ourselves living beyond our means, and I was stuck in a perpetual cycle of paying off debt and rapidly accumulating it again.
I was getting nowhere.
Relationship wise, we were both pretty grouchy and spending money, either on dinner out or a great trip to the east coast certainly alleviated some of the stress we were experiencing. It’s unfortunate that it was in large part the financial details causing the most stress between us (our secondary stress was environmental… Emma’s home office just wasn’t working for her and my work was bringing me down, man) and ironic that spending helped alleviate it.
to the rescue, sort of
Mercifully, late in the summer of ‘03 I managed to ditch the horrid job and land a temp job where I’m at today (and, actually, where I was working when I first came to Toronto). I quickly went from being paid meh, to being paid “oh, okay”… and it was nice, the extra couple hundred a month really helped, but I was still stuck in the “pay off debt, put it back on again” loop (only now, I was using debt to pay for entertainment instead of necessities).
I managed to ditch the car, which has been nothing but money saving, we moved this past April into a place where we didn’t have to pay for a garage or utilities, and I wen’t permanent which gave me a great pay raise.
And yet I still was having trouble managing my debt. I was still getting maxed out all the time. I had even calculated this plan to have all my debt paid off in 18 months, which would entail me basically surviving on potato peels but I don’t have the conviction for that.
And so, after the Christmas money sucking, I formulated a plan. A New Year’s resolution. And for month one of January, I’m doing okay at sticking to it. It’s involved me taking on another credit card but it’s for the best… really.
I requested a President’s Choice Mastercard, with a Balance Transfer Rate of 3.97%, instead of the <10% and just >10% of my line of credit and Visa respectively. I could only transfer $2k to the PCMC from my visa, but I can pay that off slowly at a comfortable and, all things considered, negligable interest rate.
I’m paying off my line of credit $400 a month (so this is a long-term project), and my Visa gets an average $300 influx each month. This is going to take two or three years to do, but I’m determined to do it.
With my current salary and expenses planned out each month (I’ve even included my regular comics, food and transportation purchases) I’ll still have some fun money to toss around. Oh it’s hardly enough to do much with but it’ll mean a few dinners out and a lot of movie watching. I just don’t know if I’ll be able to afford any vacations this year (maybe I should start pinching those Honeymoon pennies…?).
So far this month I’ve dipped into my credit less than expected so I’m actually even less than my targeted amount. I’m still not thrilled with my current CDP status but things are looking better. Let’s just hope there’s no surprises.
I think I’m going to have to put that puppy off for another year though.

Hard Time, Madrox, Containment #1, Teen Titans #20, Manhunter #6

Filed under: Sequential Art — gkentetc @ 10:41 am

hardtime.jpg
So many reviews, so many words…
In this week’s Thor’s Comic Column I take a look at the complete “First Season” (12 issues, 1-year) run of the supernatural prison drama, Hard Time.
The Identity Crisis mini-series spills over into Teen Titans #20 and Manhunter #6 (as well as Russell P. reviews the IC spillover into Superman-land).
I take a peek at the first issue IDW’s new horror/sci-fi scary-things-in-enclosed-spaces book, Containment.
And the Madrox superhero noir mini-series, based on a highly unknown X-men character, the Multiple Man (he can duplicate himself, like Michael Keaton in that movie, sorta).
Lots of other great reviews of new works by Alan Moore, Warren Ellis, Pete Milligan and more.

The Animatrix

Filed under: DeeVee — gkentetc @ 10:26 am

animatrix.jpg

d, w: various

The first Matrix film was a groundbreaking work of art blending styles of science fiction, fantasy, Japanese anime, comic books, and American blockbusters to create a movie that isn’t just watched, but experienced.
There are so many ideas inherent in the world that Larry and Andy Wachowski created, that they could be explored at lease a few hundred different ways, the spiritual aspect the most prominant of all.
It was with great enjoyment that I watched the Matrix: Reloaded. It certainly wasn’t as good as the original, if only because it decided to become more character centric, without realizing that the Matrix was the best character from the first film. Exploring Neo and his quest, and all but ignoring the immense storytelling possibilities that the Matrix presented is where the Bros. Wachowski went wrong… or so I thought.
Turns out I just hadn’t watched the Animatrix yet.

(more…)

20/01/2005

Elektra

Filed under: In Theatre — gkentetc @ 11:30 pm

elektra.jpg

d: Rob Bowman
w: Raven Metzner

Elektra isn’t a superhero movie. It’s not a spy movie. It’s not an assassin movie. It’s not a kung-fu movie. I tries to have a little of all these things but it doesn’t want to be any of them. At it heart it tries to be a personal story, but the filmmaker, scriptwriter, and lead actors just don’t have a complete grasp on who the character of Elektra is.
I watched Daredevil again after watching Electra, and while the continuity of the character is tight between the two films, one never gets the sense of who Elektra is. In Daredevil she’s a love interest whose father put her under the instruction of a different sensei every year since she was five. She appeared to die in Daredevil, but at the beginning of Electra she’s obviously alive and now she’s an assassin. Why? We don’t really find out.
What we do get is an odd flashback where a blind master sensei, Stick (Terence Stamp) revives her from death, and trains her further, but she refuses to be compassionate, or something, and he expels her from his training.

(more…)

the list of threes

Filed under: blogwatch, me me me — graigkent @ 4:08 pm

In clumps of three, a meme from Wendyloo
Some people like ‘em… some people hate ‘em, you can click to read it or not. Your choice:

(more…)

Eric B for President

Filed under: blogwatch, love or something like it, me me me — graigkent @ 3:10 pm

P.dawg, the wetNoodle yesterday was talking about how the majority of his friends, himself included, don’t want children, and the main reason, he figures, is selfishness. He said he doesn’t want to give up his freedom, or conversely, he doesn’t want to have to be that responsible.
Yes, sure, this is a perfectly acceptable reason to have kids, as it would be a horrible thing for a children to be born into families, or born of people who resent them. Resenting your own child = not cool = bad parenting.
I feel this way occasionally, that a child would be a burden on my life, a child would restrict my freedom, and that I wouldn’t be happy making the sacrifices I have to make to be a father. But I know those are false fears, as more often I find myself thinking about being a father to a child, and what a great father I would be. I love kids, generally.. sure there are individual kids whom I’ve not been too fond of (yes, I’m looking at you Anakin Skywalker…grrr) but overall I get inspired by the enthusiasm kids have, the hilarity of their niativity, and their innocent world view. As a father, I look forward to smashing that innocent world view with nightly sit-downs in front of the television set watching the news and showing my toddler the way the world really works. “Can you say ‘Bush is a puppet? Good. Now say ‘Cheney is an asshole.’ Hehe. Very nice. Hey look, it’s Rumsfeld, what do we do? That’s right, scream “RUMMY!’”
Okay, I’m just kidding on that last part, partially. But I do want a child. I want the satisfaction of raising someone, not in my own image, but to their own image. Bringing them to their fullest potential. I think about helping my kid with their homework, and watching movies or dvds with them (I so look forward to watching Pee Wee’s Playhouse with them). I think about how my kid will likely be more mature than I am by the time they are four, shaking their head as dad comes home with his latest stash of comic books and action figures.
I think about how I’m going to explain things to my kid, how my kid will be will be open and honest with me, because I’m open and honest with them. I want them to have a childhood, but I don’t want them to be unprepared. I see the way some parents deal with their children. I see some things I like, and some things I would do differently. I think about this stuff more often than I should.
Ten years ago I thought I’d be married when I was 25 or 26 and having my first (and only) kid at 28… which would be this year. That’s weird to think I’m the age now I was expecting to be a father.
Well, I’m on the marriage trail, so I’m only a couple years behind. But as much as I would love that kid with everything I got, I’m just not ready yet (and to bring my lovely bride-to-be into it) we’re not ready yet… Emotionally, perhaps I am, but financially we just aren’t stable enough to expand our family beyond me and Em and the cat and the bunny… maybe a dog at some point this year… but a baby. No, not yet.
Plus, we’re still a few years before Emma gives in on “Clark”.

18/01/2005

Saved

Filed under: DeeVee — gkentetc @ 10:32 pm

saved.jpg

d: Brian Dannelly
w: Brian Dannelly, Brian Urban

I can’t believe I watched this film… a teen comedy set at a catholic high school. Yes, that’s right.
It was an odd, odd thing… like a “Mean Girls” for the religious set. And yet, as somebody who hates that sort of thing, movies about religion that get all preachy and in your face with how anyone who’s not into Jesus is damned etc., I actually liked this movie.
As much as it sneaks (like hell, it overtly puts) some preachiness in there, it’s not like a “call this number and save your soul now” preachiness. Actually it’s more referring to tolerance and acceptance of others, not taking some things so literally, and a few other things that make this more a Liberal Christian rather than Conservative Christian movie.

(more…)

Control Room

Filed under: DeeVee — gkentetc @ 10:30 pm

controlroom.jpg

d: Jehane Noujaim

Control Room is a film about perspectives, about how one part of the world can view an event in one light, and how another part of the world can view that same thing in such a different light.
It’s also equally about presentation, and how the presentation of information can affect perception.
Al Jazeera, the Arab news network, is the CNN of the Middle East. As “objective” as CNN is, it still rallies behind its country and reports news based on interest, not any sort of importance. Specifically during the Iraq war, most of the major US media were acting as mouthpieces for Government propaganda (which is, of course, half the battle). Al Jazeera would air the exact same speeches from President Bush and Rumsfeld, but somehow they take on a completely different context when witnessed from an Middle Eastern perspective.

(more…)

Returner

Filed under: DeeVee — gkentetc @ 2:31 pm

returner.jpg

d: Takashi Yamazaki
w: Kenya Hirata and Takashi Yamazaki

The Terminator was an original film (tell that to Harlan Ellison), but it hasn’t aged well at all, which is the reason we keep getting thinly veiled retreads on the story. Most of them are low-budget, badly acted, and horribly produced with lousy effects. Returner, though, betters the formula and makes an actually decent film.
Our introduction to the apocalyptic future of 2084 is a 1-minute introduction as alien-looking force-shield protected creatures are slaughtering humans. In English, there are some cries about “last chance” as Millie runs towards a large vat of electrified ooze and jumps in.
In 2002, Myamoto is taking down some triad goons who are operating a child organ harvesting business, which have a connection to his own past. He’s finally found the head guy, an Asian Jim Jarmush-looking guy named Mizoguchi. But Miz manages to escape when Myamoto and lightning-fast reflexes is distracted by the sudden appearance of Millie, whom he believes is a triad thug and shoots her.

(more…)

17/01/2005

Crush Groove 2: Electric Boogaloo

Filed under: love or something like it — graigkent @ 10:35 pm

Open question to anyone out there… what’s your rule on crushes in relationships? What’s an acceptable crush and what isn’t? Is there such a thing?
This line of questioning was brought on partly because last week’s episode of Desperate Housewives when Lynette found out her husband accidentally saw their shapely young nanny in the buff. She was upset, not because it happened, and not because after it happened he got a little frisky with her, but because he didn’t tell her about it. “We always tell each other about our crushes,” she says.
That sounds like a good rule.
I know in the past Emma has asked me if I have or have had crushes on various people, and in almost all cases I believe they were a no (and sometimes she would question why I didn’t have crushes on them, like there’s something wrong with me). In a previous relationships, I wasn’t allowed to have crushes, or at least it felt that way because they would get upset whenever I expressed an interest or an attraction to someone else. And of course there was a double standard of they being able to comment on attractive men, but me being unable to express an opinion on women.
So I asked Emma, flat out, what the stance was on crushes in this relationship, and she said, in essence, go for it, and be prepared to be mercilessly mocked, which sounds about right. Naturally, she asked me why I was bringing this up, which wasn’t actually the Desperate Housewives thing….
Nope.
I made a new crush today, at lunchtime. A tall brunette, quite attractive, but that wasn’t it (there are plenty of attractive women out there and I never forget that Emma’s one of them), the waitress had a wonderful voice. A slight dip in octave from normal female voices, a slight rasp (but not smoker’s gravel) to it that make eardrums hum,
I said to my luncheon compatriots “I should get her to record an audio book.. the dictionary perhaps, or maybe all twenty-seven volumes of Encyclopedia Britannica.”
I can barely remember what her voice sounds like, and her image has faded away pretty fast. Freklestof mentioned how it seems a lot of people wind up developing an affection for waitstaff. We didn’t talk about it at length, and our speculations were nil… we just coined it “lunchtime crushing” - when your too busy to get out any other time so your lunch break is the only time to see/meet someone new and have a quick, concise crush-fantasy before the next half of the daily grind brings you down.
Emma says I can have as may crushes as I want as long as I always love her the most, which is an easy mission to accomplish. She’s the only one I love (that isn’t in the friendly/familial way). She said I can even lust after them, to which I gave a big squinty-eyed smile and a pleased hand clap.
“Aren’t I the best for being so supportive,” she asks.
Of course, dear.
She’s even putting up with me blogging about it.
And with me listing other crushes of mine (not a definitive list):
-Lederhosen Lucil
-Famke Janssen
-Sarah Silverman
-Wonder Woman (Lynda Carter)
-Michelle Yeoh
-Jennifer Connelly

Infernal Affairs 2: The Legend

Filed under: DeeVee — gkentetc @ 12:27 am

infernal2.jpg

d: Wai Keung Lau and Siu Fai Mak
w: Felix Chong and Siu Fai Mak

Some movies deserve sequels. The characters, the actors, the situations just call for them. The movie ends and you want nothing more than to know what happens next.
Infernal Affairs, as wonderful a film as it was, is not one of those films. It ends pretty concretely and you don’t even thing of anything beyond that. Thankfully, Infernal Affairs II:The Legend isn’t a sequel, it’s a prequel. It takes you back in time ten years, when Ming and Yan were just starting their respective missions of infiltrating the police and the triads (respectively). Sam, the kingpin from the first film doesn’t yet hold the status that will come to him, and he’s actually friends with SP Wong of the police.
If none of these names are familiar to you, that’s perfectly all right, as you learn equally as much about these characters (amongst almost a dozen others) in the prequel as you do in the first film (if not more). It suffices equally well as a self-contained film and an extension of the existing universe. Like any good “sequel”, it enhances and enriches what came before it, or in this case, what comes after it.

(more…)

16/01/2005

The Big Empty

Filed under: DeeVee — gkentetc @ 6:50 pm

empty.jpg

d, w: Steve Anderson

The Big Empty is one of those direct-to-video flicks that has a decent cast of fairly recognizable faces, some solid production values and a bit of a quirky script. It’s certainly not a bad film, as I’ve seen much, much worse, but it’s also not a film that really grabs you for any reason either.
I picked it up after watching Jon Favreau’s Dinner For Five season one on dvd, and was kind of curious about some of the films they were talking about. Favreau, I think for the first time, takes the lead role in this film. He’s certainly a likeable enough guy, but he doesn’t have that lead actor charisma that will propel him into future leading guy role. He’ll be stuck in supporting roles, but he’s good at that.
Joey Lauren Adams, Rachel Leigh Cook, Daryl Hannah, Sean Bean, Kelsey Grammer, all solid supporting players in their own right (although each has proven themselves in lead roles previously) help fill out the Lynchian-wannabe script where Favreau, an out-of-work and in-debt actor (sigh… films about actors are as creatives as novels about novelists) who’s doing deliveries on the side. He’s given a blue suitcase, enough money to pay off his debt, and a series of rules (don’t open the case) and told to go meet “the Cowboy” in some tiny forgotte dirt town.

(more…)

Godzilla vs. Megaguirus

Filed under: DeeVee — gkentetc @ 2:13 pm

megaguirus.jpg
Definitely one of the better Godzilla films. The human/military/science story unfolds without much of the typical melodrama, and is actually an interesting aspect of the film for a change.
The effects range from spectacular to painfully obvious, as if there were a couple of different production teams working independant of one another, each with varying degrees of skill. There’s some amazing underwater sequences (and one really awful one), some great mapping of Godzilla into real world imagery (some bad blue screening as well), and some actually quite decent model work (although the majority of it is bad even for a Godzilla film).
The makers roll out sometimes two, three, or four different stories at a time, and they criss-cross and merge back into one another before it all falls together at the end.
The quick and dirty: Godzilla attacks Japan for it’s atomic/nuclear power sources, so the country finds alternate energy resources, including the fortified plasma power. But still plasma causes Godzilla to seek it out, so they set up a Godzilla defence team to stave him off. This team has developed a black-hole weapon that should take care of the monster forever, but upon their first test they unleash a temporal rift, and the Meganura emerges, laying a self replicating egg. The eggs hatch and the larvae swarm attack Godzilla, stealing his radioactive energy, which they feed back to a massive pupae which births the Megaguirus.
As Godzilla attacks Tokyo once again, the defence team experiences problems with their black hole gun, and while they repair it, the G-lizard and the giant bug thing have an awesome battle on the shores of Japan’s economic centre. There’s a whole lot of little side paths, but that’s the basics. The ending is obvious but altogether a really fun movie.

14/01/2005

Sadly, that’s still our Bush

Filed under: catchy — graigkent @ 3:28 pm

Multimedia maestro John Oswald creates art out of things that may already be considered art, and has been doing so for decades. His Plunderphonics project is legendary for the copyright infringement court cases it inspired and for his innovative “recontextualizing” modern music (he was doing “mash-ups” back in the 70’s with a spools of audio ribbon, scissors, and some scotch tape).
Negativland is a group of classified individuals doing much of the same thing, only with more of a left-wing anti-consumerist nature. Their projects are as much message as decon/reconstructionism.
Similarly, British cut-n-taper Chris Morris is equally, if not further left wing. But he’s also the most public, hosting radio shows as well as BBC investigative journalism series. There’s a Michael Moore-ish humourous bent, but he’s perhaps not as direct, and less loudmouthy for sure.
Recent blogfodder from Morris explains how interesting the words people say are, and how easily they can be taken out of context (or in this case, with the Puppet, actually reintroducing context to them). Warp Records releases Morris’ audio work and provides these samples:
An mp3 file of a recontextualized Bush speech
A different speech recontextualized, seemlessly cut video
On that same bent, here’s a real video file from Mike Nourse which exemplifies the Bush doctrine of repetition of buzz words while speech-giving. Fascinating.
From dozer’s blog (via Res

13/01/2005

oreh!?

Filed under: blogwatch — graigkent @ 11:36 pm

The Functional Ambivalent points out that ESPN is actually doing better in their ratings without NHL hockey (airing poker and low-level basketball instead). Wow… that’s gotta hurt.

tv succubus

One of my favourite restaurants in Toronto is Grapefruit Moon. It’s a cozy place on Bathurst north of Bloor. When Emma and I were there recently we noticed that they had a fresh coat of paint and a bit of a do-up… which they seemed a little dismissive of. This week’s Eye has an article called “Extreme Fakeover” which details the Moon’s nasty experience with a “makeover” show which really kinda screwed them over. It’s one thing to redo someone’s home with superficiality in mind, but business needs practicality. And I bet the show will gloss over any negativity that may have surfaced, opting instead for its own teledrama.

hongry hippo
The Freakgirl directs us to this cute article about ugly animals. 120 year old turtle adopts a baby hippo.

you don’t have to say doubleyou-doubleyou-doubleyou

Tonight’s episode of Home Movies on Teletoon had Brendan becoming a reviewer for doubleyou-doubleyou-doubleyou-dot movie wiener or winner dot com… and it’s a real fake site (requires flash)

I resolve to be a better person.

Filed under: me me me — graigkent @ 12:56 am

An ten other things I may or may not accomplish this year.

  1. get my finances in order, with an elaborate scheme of self-control and fiscal responsibility
  2. “graig movie night” once a week (wherein graig goes to the movies once a week on a regular scheduled day… which looks like wednesday)
  3. at least attempt to write this year (I’d like me to do at least one story every quarter)
  4. all music purchases shall be made on-line and downloaded (iTunes), unless they are made at a concert or are bands not available for purchase via mp3
  5. lazik surgery on the ol’ peepers
  6. save receipts from purchases…get a folder
  7. less junk food, more exercise
  8. books/audio books - at least 1 per month (comics not included)
  9. at least one concert per month (last year was pathetic)
  10. boxing… maybe… or perhaps a new tv

Godzilla vs MechaGodzilla

Filed under: DeeVee — gkentetc @ 12:30 am

mechagodzilla.jpg
Giant rubber-suited monster films aren’t really worth the time analysing or reviewing unless you do so in comparison to other films within the same genre. You just can’t compare Gamera to Godfather… hell you can’t even compare Mothra to Harold & Kumar.
Giant monster films have their own language (no, not Japanese) which anyone watching should immediately understand. Plots are only put in place to allow for massive destruction of poorly and/or painstakingly crafted miniatures, or else to watch giant monsters battle one another… while destroying poorly and/or painstakingly crafted miniatures. Toho, the studio behind Godzilla, is the lord of the manor when it comes to this… an not because they’re the best (the 90’s Gamera films rival the best of Toho’s work) but because they got the king of all monsters (wait… that’s King Kong).
Anyway, how does Godzill vs MechaGodzilla stack up against others? Well, the rubber suits are great, the actors in them are horrid… the minaiture work is pretty awful, and the digital effects are either blatant or nonexistant. The human story is trite but better done than it should be (because having the story of one individual in the film about a monster 1000 times their size is kinda dumb). The monster story involving the building of a offensive weapon out of metal on the skeletal structure of the original Godzilla is kinda fun… but this definitely isn’t the best of the Godzilla bunch… somewhere around the lower meridian I’d say.

12/01/2005

I <3 Huckabees

Filed under: In Theatre — gkentetc @ 11:46 pm

ihearthuckabees.jpg

d: David O. Russell
w: David O. Russell & Jeff Baena

existentialism

def: A philosophy that emphasizes the uniqueness and isolation of the individual experience in a hostile or indifferent universe, regards human existence as unexplainable, and stresses freedom of choice and responsibility for the consequences of one’s acts.

Existentialism is, to me, about as meaningful as religion, politics or psychiatry. Some people can really get into one -or all- of them. I’m generally not one of those people, and that’s where I have difficulty with Russell’s new film I (Heart) Huckabees…
It’s a very entertaining film… immensely funny, with a solid cast and some truly wonderful performances by all the major players, Jason Schwartzman, Jude Law, Lily Tomlin, Dustin Hoffman, Isabelle Huppert, Naomi Watts, and even Mark Whalberg (who puts in his best performance since the last film he and Russell did together, Three Kings). There’s clever and subtle effect that help visually manifest the existentialist dialogue on screen, and a fantastic score by Jon Brion… and yet, as much as I liked everything, I didn’t really get into the film.

(more…)

Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress